Jake’s recent post on giving and taking ~ here ~ really caught my interest.
i had a lot of feeling about it {probably due to some past stuff that got triggered, which really, you’d think i’d be over by now, only you know how that is, apparently i’m not quite.}
i didn’t want to think about that now, i wanted to go on to the part where i emailed my Sir to ask Him to read the article and give me His thoughts on it.
But.
Damn it. Apparently this is going to be one of those redemptive experiences where i have to remember what i felt back then first before i can move on.
Ok. Here we go.
When i got married the first time, it was with the understanding that we were equals. We both worked. We both did housework. We both took care of his daughter.
Over time that changed. At some point, i realized that he thought anything he did, other than paid employment, was above and beyond his responsibility. Everything else was my responsibility, and really kind of the least i could do.
By those standards, he could never do too little, and i could never do enough. He totally expected “extra credit” for anything he did around the house or with the kids. My paid employment didn’t earn “credit,” even though we couldn’t have paid our bills without it, because it gave me less time to take care of him and the kids.
And i did appreciate the things he did. Not every little thing, but lots of things, and i was generous with praise.
Anyhow i don’t mean this to turn into a post about my first marriage, and i don’t mean to sound like a victim.
i was telling Sir last night that i used to laugh about it; i’d say to my husband, “Yep, there’s 2 kinds of people in this world, givers and takers. And you’re just a giver ~ you just give, give, give, and i’m just a taker ~ i just take, take, take. That’s just how it is.”
i was totally being sarcastic. i didn’t believe that for a minute.
But i think that’s what i was thinking about when i read Jake’s post, so i was in a little mini-panic when i asked Sir what His thoughts were.
Sir emailed back the following:
“First of all, I don’t see it as a taking , but rather “receiving”, such as in the giving and receiving of a gift, not the taking of a gift, or perhaps the receiving and giving of instructions, not taking of instructions. In the context of what appears to be taking, it can be seen rather as receiving the acceptance of the taking by the giving. (The giving person accepts the taking by the other person… that acceptance is received by that other person, who is perceived as a taker)
I think the giving and receiving goes both ways in any relationship, but remember that a very wise man once said symmetry is not balance. What determines the correct balance of giving/receiving between the individuals is a personal matter to be resolved within the back and forth of the relationship. Passionate people do this passionately. The D/s relationship provides a framework for the balance of giving/receiving to find its own dynamic.
The Dom is ultimately responsible for many things including safety and the overall tone of the setting, the Dom “gives” that care and acceptance of responsibility and the sub ” receives ” that and finds value in it. The sub reciprocally gives obedience and personal service, among other things, and the Dom “receives” that personal commitment and finds value in that. The giving and receiving is so integrated that it’s difficult to discern and assign those terms. Persons of deep thought find multiple examples in every interaction.
In my mind, the Dom also mentors and provides emotional growth for the sub. While exploring personal horizons, the giving and receiving become: sharing.
That’s my two cents…”
That relieved my mind and restored my perspective.
i think {forgive me, Jake, if i’m wrong here} that what Jake was expressing is that being a Dom isn’t just about getting your own needs met. It carries a real burden of responsibility. i think that’s true no matter what your dynamic is ~ as true for Omega and mouse as for Jake and Joy and Sir X and me.
From outside the lifestyle, it might look like the flow of “giving” is from sub to Dom, but that’s not accurate. i think it’s a dance of giving and receiving.
i had forgotten, before i got Sir’s response, that i wrote about giving and receiving from a vanilla perspective a while back. i said, in part, something like this:
It’s like plugging in a light ~ the socket receives the prongs of the plug, and gives out a flow of electricity. The prongs receive the electricity and pass it on. Together, they create a circuit of giving and receiving that turns on the light.
When i was married the first time, i wasn’t valued for who i was, and what i had to offer wasn’t found adequate or acceptable, no matter what i did. That hurt me deeply.
i found ways to be ok anyhow. But i still carry some of that anxiety that what i offer will never be quite enough ~ and don’t we all?
Today, i feel less anxious than i did just a few days ago. Thank you, Sir, for your wise and reassuring perspective.
And ~ this cracks me up ~ i just found a post i wrote just about a year ago about giving. Here it is… laughing… from my own archives.